한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

qin lihong's questioning is not a single incident, but a reflection on the "low-level involution" behavior that is prevalent in the industry. he emphasized that nio's weekly sales data is highly confidential within the company, and called on relevant departments to strengthen supervision of the release of such information to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the company. this voice is consistent with the previous public dissatisfaction of nio's founder li bin, jointly advocating the industry's emphasis on data protection and resistance to unauthorized information. they all realize that in a highly competitive market environment, data is the core resource of the enterprise, and its security and confidentiality are crucial.

this kind of "low-level involution" behavior not only occurs in the automotive field, but also refers to the widespread competition problems in the entire economic development process. for example, in the internet industry, in order to attract users, some platforms will publish false data or engage in market speculation, which ultimately damages user trust and market fairness. these phenomena reflect the recognition of the use and value of data in social development, and also suggest that we need to think about the significance of data security and trade secret protection from a more profound perspective.

perhaps we should interpret qin lihong's criticism from a more macro perspective. his voice can be seen as a reflection on the industry as a whole. he hopes that through public appeals, the entire industry will move towards a more fair, transparent and compliant direction. this "confidentiality" thinking may also mean that in an era of rapid technological development, we need to re-examine the meaning of data, as well as the opportunities and challenges it brings, and strive to build a more just, stable and sustainable social environment.