한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

To understand this incident in depth, we first need to understand the background and specific content of the European Commission's preliminary ruling. Preliminary rulings are often made on the basis of complex investigations and assessments, but there may be problems such as information asymmetry and misunderstanding. Shi Yonghong's application is a strong rebuttal to this possible erroneous determination. This behavior not only represents the position of the China Chamber of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, but also reflects the determination of Chinese companies to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in international trade.

From a more macro perspective, this incident is closely related to the changes in the global trade pattern. With the deepening development of economic globalization, the trade dependence between countries has continued to increase, but at the same time, trade frictions have also increased. Against this background, the trade relations between EU member states and China are also facing new challenges and opportunities.

The formulation and implementation of trade rules play a vital role in international trade. As the cornerstone of international trade, WTO rules are intended to maintain a fair and just trading environment. However, in actual operations, due to differences in the understanding and application of rules among countries, trade disputes continue to emerge. Shi Yonghong's request to the European Commission to correct the erroneous determination of the preliminary ruling is also a call for compliance with WTO rules to ensure the fairness and legality of trade.

This incident is an important lesson for Chinese companies. It reminds Chinese companies to fully understand international rules, strengthen their own compliance management, and improve their ability to deal with trade disputes when participating in international trade. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen cooperation with industry associations to form a joint force to jointly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies.

For EU member states, this incident should also cause them to reflect. When formulating trade policies and making preliminary rulings, they should fully consider the interests of all parties, follow the principles of fairness and justice, and avoid damaging bilateral trade relations due to erroneous determinations. Only on the basis of mutual respect and equal consultation can a win-win trade situation be achieved.

From the perspective of the global economy, this incident also reflects the fragility and imperfection of the current global trade system. International trade needs more transparent, fair and effective rules and mechanisms to reduce trade frictions and promote the stable growth of the global economy.

In short, the incident in which Shi Yonghong of the China Chamber of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering requested the European Commission to correct the erroneous determination of the preliminary ruling and terminate the investigation has far-reaching significance and impact. It not only concerns the interests of Chinese companies, but also affects the evolution of the global trade pattern. We hope that all parties can resolve trade disputes through equal dialogue and consultation and promote the healthy development of global trade.