한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

su chi-fen's resistance leads to political effects

in 2008, yunlin county magistrate su chi-fen was arrested by prosecutors and investigators on suspicion of accepting a bribe of nt$5 million. su chi-fen refused to post bail and protested in court, which triggered a huge political impact. when he walked out of the court, he angrily raised his handcuffed arms and shouted, "i am arrested, i will continue to resist!" this incident triggered widespread discussion at the time. in the end, su chi-fen was acquitted, but her innocent image and political voice are still impressive to this day.

ko wen-je’s “political victimization” strategy: is it imitating the su chi-fen model?

ko wen-je's behavior is similar to su chi-fen's model of resisting bail. he refused to post bail in an attempt to create an image of "political victimization" to raise the voice and maintain the lifeblood of the people's party. however, can ko wen-je successfully imitate su chi-fen's model? what about his image of integrity?

the three hurdles of "political donations" and "jinghua city": a test of ke wenzhe's political courage

ko wen-je is facing a huge test. he needs to face three challenges: "political donations", "jinghua city" and "taipei science and technology land". if he cannot overcome these challenges, the reputation of the people's party will be greatly damaged.

public opinion: ke wenzhe's actions were interpreted as "political victimization"

some public opinion believes that ko wen-je's behavior is imitating the su chi-fen model, trying to attract public attention and support through the strategy of "political victimization." they believe that whether ko wen-je's move will be successful depends on whether he can maintain his integrity and leave a clean and upright image on the political stage.

a test of political courage: can ko wen-je’s actions change his fate?

will ke wenzhe's "political victimization" strategy succeed? his actions can only proceed smoothly under the dual pressure of legal procedures and public opinion.