news
News
home > industry news > double-standard justice, a reflection of an era
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
xie longjie believes that there should be no "double standards" in the judiciary. he hopes that the judiciary will always remain fair and just and conduct a comprehensive investigation of all corruption cases. he believes that ko wen-je must face the judiciary himself for the case he is involved in. however, xie longjie also pointed out that as a representative, the double standards of the judiciary are an object that needs to be supervised, and he called for judicial transparency and fairness.
his accusation is not simply against ko wen-je, but a reflection on taiwan's judicial system as a whole. he believes that there should be no "double standards" in the judiciary, and he hopes that the judiciary will always remain fair and just, and conduct a comprehensive investigation of all corruption cases.
xie longjie's views have triggered public reflection on the judicial system. he proposed that the judiciary should be more fair and just, rather than selectively investigating and judging. he called for judicial transparency and fairness, and reminded everyone to maintain their adherence to judicial fairness.
the lin bingshu incident has also once again triggered judicial reflection. his case involves the case of former democratic progressive party legislator gao jiayu and duan yikang's political background. the incident exposed the complex relationships in taiwan's political field and also raised people's doubts about judicial transparency.
when xie longjie mentioned the ke wenzhe case, he once again emphasized the double-standard judicial issue and pointed out that this reflects the shortcomings of the judicial system. he hopes that the judiciary can be more fair and just, rather than selectively investigating and trying.
the double standards of taiwan's judicial system have also caused the public to question the fairness of the judiciary. they call for the judiciary to be more transparent and fair.
this double standard judicial issue reminds each of us that we need to be vigilant at all times and push the judicial system to conduct more efficient supervision and reform.